Grapin & Chaykin, M.D., P.A. v. Turnoff & Fox, M.D., P.A.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The trial court order adjudging plaintiffs in contempt of court and ordering them to *134pay to the defendants the sum of $250 per day for each and every day they remained in violation of orders requiring them to make discovery, is void for the failure of the order to contain findings that the alleged contemnors had the present ability to comply with the underlying discovery orders. Garo v. Garo, 347 So.2d 418 (Fla.1977); Epstein v. Epstein, 345 So.2d 398 (Fla.3d DCA 1977).
Reversed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Garo v. GaroSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Epstein v. EpsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
3Cited by6 opinions
- CCI v. America II Electronics, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Department of Children and Families v. RHDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Paramount Advisors, Inc. v. SchwartzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Grapin & Chaykin, M.D., P.A. v. Turnoff & Fox, M.D., P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Champagne-Webber-Anderson, Inc. v. Blanchard Machinery, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.