Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 30, 1949No. 4-8847PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This suit was begum by the appellants, assignees of a contract for the purchase of land, to obtain rescission and damages upon the ground that their participation in the contract was induced by fraud. By cross complaint the appellees asserted that appellants were delinquent in their payments and asked foreclosure of their equitable lien. The chancellor found-no merit in the allegations of fraud and accordingly ordered foreclosure. This appeal followed.

Appellant John J. Brooks is the third recently discharged war veteran who has attempted to make a success at farming this land. In 1945…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fitzhugh v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  2. Manwaring v. Farmers' Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Mayhue v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peek v. MeadorsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Hogue v. HogueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. s.o.g.-san Ore-Gardner v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Travelers Indemnity Company. s.o.g.-san Ore-Gardner v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. S.O.G.-San Ore-Gardner v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API