Legal Opinion

Fox v. Pittsburg State University

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided June 26, 2017No. Case No. 14-CV-2606-JARPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JULIE A.'ROBINSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This employment discrimination action was tried to a jury, which found in favor of Plaintiff Martha Fox on her claims of hostile work environment sexual harassment under Title VII and Title IX against Defendant Pittsburg State University (“PSU”). This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Alter Judgment for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (Doc. 211). In conjunction with Plaintiffs fee application, the Court also considers Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Reply Brief in Support of Attorneys’ Fees and Costs…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Ross v. JenkinsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
  2. Awad v. Coffey Health SystemDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
  3. Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust v. Becker Boiler Co., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2021
  4. City of Las Cruces v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022
  5. City of Las Cruces v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API