Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hedges

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action upon promissory notes. Motion to serve an amended answer.

1Opinion of the CourtCeahe, J.

This action is brought upon two notes given as a part consideration by the defendant for construction and erection of an asphalt plant and machinery. The plaintiff as an assignee of the notes took then subject to all the equities, so that any defense or counterclaim good as against the assignor, the Pioneer Iron Works, would be good against him, at least to the amount of the notes. Siebert v. Dunn, 70 Misc. Rep. 422; Zabriskie v. Central Vermont R. R. Co., 131 N. Y. 72; Phillips v. Taylor, 49 N. Y. Super. Ct. 318. The machinery was constructed under written contract by the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Brown v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Bates v. Fish Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Wiles v. ProvostAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Seibert v. DunnNew York Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. HedgesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  2. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. PamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API