Legal Opinion

Village of Fairview v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1907No. Docket No. 49PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Hosmer, Donovan, Murphy, and Brooke, JJ. Bill by the village of Fairview and others against the city of Detroit and others to enjoin the interference with the officers or agents of complainant village, and for other relief. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainants appeal.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Wayne; Hosmer, Donovan, Murphy, and Brooke, JJ. Bill by the village of Fairview and others against the city of Detroit and others to enjoin the interference with the officers or agents of complainant village, and for other relief. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainants appeal. The purpose of this bill is to enjoin the defendants from interfering with the officers or agents of the village of Fairview in the performance of their duties under the village charter; from taking possession of the books of the village and from levying and collecting taxes upon any property within…

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

(after stating the facts). “No law shall embrace more than one object which shall be expressed in its title.” Art. 4, § 20, Const, of Michigan. Clearly but one object is expressed in the title to this act, namely, to annex the entire territory composing the village of Fairview to the city of Detroit. This title gave notice to *4legislators and to the people of the city of Detroit, of the township and of the village of Fairview, who were the sole parties interested, that no other purpose should be found in the body of the bill. The people of Detroit might be willing that the entire territory…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brooks v. HydornMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Blades v. Board of Water CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. People v. Worden Grocer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Davies v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Callaghan v. ChipmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Forrester v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hume v. Village of FruitportMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Bloss v. SchreiterMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Otto v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Residents of the West Side v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API