Legal Opinion

Fruit Company v. Palmer and Another

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 2, 1925No. 24,219PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

An action to recover $500 paid in advance on the price of 5 carloads of potatoes. When the goods were tendered they were refused by plaintiff, the purchaser, for alleged defect of quality, his contention being that they were not up to grade in several particulars, among others that they were packed in old instead of new sacks. The decision below was for plaintiff, and the case having been dismissed as to George C. Palmer, individually, defendant George C. Palmer, Inc., appeals from the judgment. A former appeal was from the order denying its motion for a new trial. 158 Minn. 531, 197 N. W.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Palmer Fruit Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eilola v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API