Clark & Loftus v. Pope
Supreme Court of Florida
Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Duval county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the -court.
1Opinion of the Court
Mabey, J.:
The defendant in error commenced a suit in September, A. D. 1887, in the Circuit Court for Duval county, against plaintiff in error to recover the sum of one thousand and • five dollars, alleged to be due for services rendered as an attorney at law. The material averments of the declaration are as follows: .“For that the said defendants are indebted to plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and five dollars, for money payable by defendants to plaintiff, for legal services as an attorney at law, done and rendered by plaintiff for defend-, ants at their request.”
“And in a like sum for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schultz v. Pacific InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1872
- Miller v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
- Nickels v. MooringSupreme Court of Florida · 1877
- Wilson v. DibbleSupreme Court of Florida · 1872
- Wilson v. MarksSupreme Court of Florida · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Huntley v. BayaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Crosby v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Florida Fire & Casualty Insurance v. HartSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- American Automobile Ins. Asso. v. FolsomSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Lowe v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1929