Legal Opinion

Hanners v. Pender Mill I Associates

Fairfax County Circuit Court

Decided August 23, 1990No. Case No. (Law) 96326PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By JUDGE ROSEMARIE ANNUNZIATA

The matter to be addressed by the Court in this opinion letter is defendant Henry A. Long Company’s motion to strike the allegations seeking indemnification contained in the cross-claim filed by Commercial Building Maintenance, Inc. Having considered the pleadings, the arguments of counsel and the relevant law applicable to the matter, I will sustain the demurrer.

Henry A. Long Company argues first in its memorandum that Virginia does not recognize a non-contractual basis for indemnity. Defendant cites VEPCO v. Wilson, 221 Va. 979, 982 (1982), for the proposition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  2. Adams Outdoor Advertising v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  3. Richardson v. Econo-Travel Motor Hotel Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1982
  4. Whittle v. Timesavers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sanderling v. Donohoe Co.Fairfax County Circuit Court · 1998
  2. Fielder's Choice Enterprise, Inc. v. Augusta CountyAugusta County Circuit Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API