Legal Opinion

Moberly Asphalt Maintance, Inc. v. Royal Associates, Ltd.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1980No. 5306PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

This is a multi-issue appeal from the judgment of the trial court which found that a residential developer was justified in refusing to pay most of the balance due a subcontractor on two contracts for the reason that the subcontractor’s work was deficient. We will affirm on the ground that the record supports the trial court’s various factual findings. This resolution makes unnecessary a consideration of many of the challenges to the court’s legal conclusions.

Moberly Asphalt Maintenance, Inc., plaintiff-appellant, is a paving contractor. The defendant-appellee, Royal Associates,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. DS v. Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Douglas Reservoirs Water Users Ass'n v. CrossWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Gardner v. WalkerWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Lewis v. Anchorage Asphalt Paving Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Palmeno v. CashenWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Alpine Climate Control, Inc. v. DJ's, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API