Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cash v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 14, 1992No. 90-3438Published

1DissentZehmer, Judge

I respectfully dissent because the majority opinion has declined to address the critical issue presented on this appeal, i.e., whether appellant Cash was convicted of a *1357nonexistent offense when the court adjudicated him guilty of violating the theft statute, section 812.014, Florida Statutes (1987), by not paying the alleged sales taxes when due. Conviction of a nonexistent offense is fundamental error that should be addressed by the court regardless of whether it was properly preserved for review. E.g., Achin v. State, 436 So.2d 30 (Fla.1983); Brown v. State, 550 So.2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Adams v. CulverSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Achin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. State v. McAdamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Fiske v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API