Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Estate of Palmer

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1985No. 84-167Published

1DissentJustice Morrison

Counsel for appellant and respondent have focused on the question of whether the assets here involved are partnership assets. Such a determination is not dispositive.

Because the parties have presented the case to the District Court on the issue of whether the disputed property was partnership property or joint tenancy property, the District Court decided the case *301without addressing the true issue. This Court, in its majority opinion, does deal with the issue upon which the case turns, but, in my opinion, erroneously relies upon ancient authority.

The question involved in this case is whether…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sargent v. BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  2. Hunter v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Pelton's Exr. v. DumasSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  4. Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  5. Green v. WhaleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API