Horne v. Horace Mann Insurance Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
| iNORRIS, Judge.
Arnita Horne and her husband filed suit against her automobile insurance carrier, Horace Mann Insurance Company (“Horace Mann”) and Frederick Taylor. Horace Mann filed a motion for summary judgment urging that Arnita vaEdly rejected UM coverage. The District Court agreed and dis*274missed all claims against Horace Mann with prejudice; plaintiffs appeal.1 We affirm.
I
In May, 1992, Arnita suffered personal injuries as a result of an automobile collision with Taylor, the alleged tortfeasor. Because Taylor was uninsured or underinsured, Arni-ta sought UM coverage from Horace Mann.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tugwell v. State Farm Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Daigle v. AuthementSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Banks v. State Farm Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Anderson v. Allstate Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- Holbrook v. HollidayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Leger v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001