Drake v. Detroit Edison Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOX, Chief Judge.
This matter has been renewed following a determination by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that institution of agency proceedings against defendants, as requested by plaintiffs pursuant to 10 CFR § 2.206, was not appropriate. I stayed this case on January 19,1978 pending action by the NRC. In light of the NRC’s determination it is now proper to remove the stay and proceed. 1
Before considering the'.merits* of plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction it is necessary to decide whether plaintiffs have standing to bring this action. It has been noted that “[t]he…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cutler v. KennedyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
- United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Radiation Technology, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995