Legal Opinion

Drake v. Detroit Edison Co.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 26, 1978No. G77-364 C.APublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOX, Chief Judge.

This matter has been renewed following a determination by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that institution of agency proceedings against defendants, as requested by plaintiffs pursuant to 10 CFR § 2.206, was not appropriate. I stayed this case on January 19,1978 pending action by the NRC. In light of the NRC’s determination it is now proper to remove the stay and proceed. 1

Before considering the'.merits* of plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction it is necessary to decide whether plaintiffs have standing to bring this action. It has been noted that “[t]he…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cutler v. KennedyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
  2. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Radiation Technology, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
  3. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API