McCloskey v. School District No. 5
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Mecosta; Palmer, J. Assumpsit by Edna McCloskey against school district No. 5 of Wheatland township, upon a teacher’s contract. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
March 4, 1901, the parties to this suit entered into a written contract by which said defendant (a graded school district in Mecosta county) employed plaintiff to teach its school for nine months, commencing September 2, 1901, at a salary of $30 per month. At the time this contract was made, plaintiff had a third-grade teacher’s certificate authorizing her to teach school in the county of Mecosta for the .year ending June 29, 1901. July 31, 1901, the trustees of the defendant school district canceled said contract with the plaintiff, and at once notified her of their action. August 24, 1901,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- O'Leary v. School District No. 4Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by4 opinions
- Zevin v. School District No. 11Nebraska Supreme Court · 1944
- Richards v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- School District No. 46 v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
- School District No. 46 v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1914