Schaefer v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
HAWKINS, Judge.
The authorities referred to in Esquival v. State, 93 Tex. Crim. Rep. 125, 246 S. W. 399, and Sims v. State, 96 Tex. Crim. Rep. 519, 258 S. W. 165, which are cited in our original opinion, amply support the holding announced. More recent decisions on the point are Ross v. State, 100 Tex. Crim. Rep. 295, 273 S. W. 582; Thomas v. State, 101 Tex. Crim. Rep. 144, 274 S. W. 577.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.
Overruled.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Esquivel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Sims v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925