Legal Opinion

State v. Heckathorne

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 27, 2008No. 050014CR, A128670 (Control), 050015CR, A128671PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendants appeal their convictions for possession of a precursor substance with intent to manufacture a controlled substance, ORS 475.967, assigning error to the trial court’s denial of their motion to suppress evidence. They argue that law enforcement officials performed an unlawful search when, during an inventory of the contents of defendants’ automobile, and without a warrant, they seized and then later opened and tested the contents of a metal gas cylinder containing, as it turned out, anhydrous ammonia, a precursor substance used in the manufacture of methamphetamine. Defendants…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. ReadyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. State v. KruchekCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HeckathorneOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. LumanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. DodgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. BellarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. BellarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API