Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Swift & Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 3, 1934No. 4697PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

Plaintiff claims of defendant and its insur,er compensation, and $150 for burial expenses, under Act No. 20 of 1914, as amended, for herself individually and for the benefit of her minor child, Williett Young, for the death of her alleged husband, John W. Jackson. Mary Helen Towns, a dependent daughter of Jackson, intervened, denying the claim of plaintiff and asserting her sole right to compensation.

Defendants answer, denying the claims of both plaintiff and intervener.

When on the trial of the case it developed that Williett Young was not the daughter of plaintiff, the demand as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
  2. Saloy v. CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  3. Hahn v. KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  4. Stark v. BurkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1854

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Succession of Smith v. Kavanaugh, Pierson & TalleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. King v. CancienneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  3. Cortes v. FlemingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  4. Skelton v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Daughtry v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API