Legal Opinion
Moore v. Local No. 10, Plumbers & Steamfitters Union
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided January 18, 1971No. Record No. 7268PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The court below dismissed appellant’s action on the ground that the activity complained of in his motion for judgment came within the proscriptions of the Taft-Hartley Act1 thereby preempting the state court of jurisdiction.
Moore filed his motion against T. A. Talley & Co., Inc., hereinafter called “Talley”, and Local No. 10, Plumbers and Steamfitters Union, hereinafter called “the Union”, seeking to recover both compensatory and punitive damages.
*521He alleged that he is a former employee of Talley and a former member of the Union, and in 1955 he had been illegally fined and suspended from the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local 1625 v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Walles v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Mathews v. Twin City Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Hill v. Virginia Employment CommissionChesterfield County Circuit Court · 1995
- Mathews v. Twin City Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984