People v. Mesce
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Dissent
HODGE, J.,†
J.,f Dissenting in part.—I dissent from the affirmance of the judgment of conviction on the charge of unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of Penal Code section 12021, subdivision (c) (section 12021(c)).
*628I.
The ex post facto clause prohibits any law which punishes persons, or increases their punishment, for conduct predating its enactment. (See Cummings v. Missouri (1866) 71 U.S. (4 Wall.) 277, 325-326 [18 L.Ed. 356, 363-364], quoted in Weaver v. Graham (1981) 450 U.S. 24, 28 [101 S.Ct. 960, 963-964, 67 L.Ed.2d 17]; and see Beazell v. Ohio (1925) 269 U.S. 167, 169-170 [46…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.