Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Mesce

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1997No. A071221Published

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Dissent

HODGE, J.,†

J.,f Dissenting in part.—I dissent from the affirmance of the judgment of conviction on the charge of unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of Penal Code section 12021, subdivision (c) (section 12021(c)).

*628I.

The ex post facto clause prohibits any law which punishes persons, or increases their punishment, for conduct predating its enactment. (See Cummings v. Missouri (1866) 71 U.S. (4 Wall.) 277, 325-326 [18 L.Ed. 356, 363-364], quoted in Weaver v. Graham (1981) 450 U.S. 24, 28 [101 S.Ct. 960, 963-964, 67 L.Ed.2d 17]; and see Beazell v. Ohio (1925) 269 U.S. 167, 169-170 [46…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API