Legal Opinion

Reese Bernard Electric Co. v. Leventry

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1931No. Appeal 30PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthkop, J.,

This is an action of replevin for a washing machine. Defendant filed a counter-bond and retained possession of the property. Plaintiff got a judgment against defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense and had a writ of inquiry to assess damages issued to the sheriff. The jury of inquisition found that plaintiff sustained no damages. On an application by plaintiff to the court below the finding of the jury was set aside and an alias writ was issued. The jury selected under this writ, after a hearing, found that the machine had “no market value.” Plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bigham v. Wabash-Pittsburg Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Eckman v. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Watkins v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837
  4. Barbara Gesell's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  5. Miller v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. Economy Bank of AmbridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Sands v. ForrestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Weider v. HoffmanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Stevenson v. Economy Bank of AmbridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API