Reese Bernard Electric Co. v. Leventry
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gawthkop, J.,
This is an action of replevin for a washing machine. Defendant filed a counter-bond and retained possession of the property. Plaintiff got a judgment against defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense and had a writ of inquiry to assess damages issued to the sheriff. The jury of inquisition found that plaintiff sustained no damages. On an application by plaintiff to the court below the finding of the jury was set aside and an alias writ was issued. The jury selected under this writ, after a hearing, found that the machine had “no market value.” Plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bigham v. Wabash-Pittsburg Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Eckman v. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Watkins v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837
- Barbara Gesell's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
- Miller v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stevenson v. Economy Bank of AmbridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Sands v. ForrestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Weider v. HoffmanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Stevenson v. Economy Bank of AmbridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964