Legal Opinion

Stidham v. Dubose

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 11, 1924No. 11445PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

March 11, 1924. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The plaintiff while walking upon a public highway, at night, was run down and injured by an automobile operated by the defendant. He instituted the present action for damages, alleging that the injury was caused by the negligence of the defendant in certain particulars; he did not allege that it was caused by the willful or malicious conduct of the defendant.

At the time of the commencement of the action the plaintiff sued out an attachment against the automobile and procured a warrant for the arrest of the defendant under the arrest…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HollmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  2. People ex rel. Mark v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. People ex rel. Harris v. GillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Davids v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  5. Kimbrell v. BerrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harris-Jenkins v. Nissan Car Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Cheap-O's Truck Stop, Inc. v. CloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. John Wesley Carter v. Troy Joe Lynch, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  4. Brown v. NixSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  5. Cheap-O's Truck Stop, Inc. v. CloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API