Hookfin v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtJjFITZSIMMONS, J.
The trial court found that defendant, Pharoah’s Palace, Inc., had no duty to protect plaintiffs decedent, Marc Antonio Hookfin. The trial court opined in written reasons that, without a duty to protect, any issues of fact remaining were not material. The trial court granted Pharoah’s Palace, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. The judgment dismissed, with prejudice, the suit filed by decedent’s father, Mr. Anthony Hookfin (Mr. Hookfin). We vacate the judgment, and remand.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Pharoah’s Palace, Inc. d/b/a Cajun Hall (Pharoah’s) entered into a lease with C-LOC Records,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Kenney v. CoxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Atkins v. FrazellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Singletary v. Crown ZellerbachLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992