Legal Opinion
Ferro v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 15, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order granting defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars modified by disallowing items V, VI, VII, VIII, IX and X. As so modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. Plaintiffs are not required to disclose evidentiary facts under the guise of a bill of particulars. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
2Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of HerleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- Palazzo v. AbbateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974