Legal Opinion

People v. Crosby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the trial court’s entire charge on the defense of justification, we find that it was without reversible error. One may be justified in using deadly physical force upon another if he "reasonably believes that such other person is using or about to use deadly physical force” (Penal Law § 35.15 [2] [a]). The defense is only available where the belief of the defendant that he was subject to an imminent attack is a reasonable one (People v Miller, 39 NY2d 543, 548). The court’s charge tracked the statute and made it clear that it was defendant’s perception of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. WagmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. People v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SappAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. People v. CottoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. People v. BrundidgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. ColbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API