Skolnick v. State

I concur in the majority's affirmance of each of Skolnick's three contempt convie-tions. I feel compelled, however, to make several observations and statements which may serve to clarify my position and to set forth certain points at which my views depart from those of the majority.

The majority opinion separates its treatment by cause number and by numerical delineation of the issues. For simplicity, I will do the same.

PSC 354

ISSUE I

Sufficiency of Evidence

I agree that the evidence supports Skol-nick's two contempt convictions on July 16, 1975.

ISSUE II

Contempt Procedure I would agree that the…