Legal Opinion

Kienzle v. Kienzle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 30, 1990No. 89-1813PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We dismiss the appeal upon the following analysis.

The trial court entered a partial final judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage, indicating that a final hearing would be held at a subsequent time, and reserving jurisdiction over all issues. The subsequently entered order dated May 26, 1989, approving a report of the general master, does not contain sufficient indicia of finality to constitute a final judgment. It is an interlocutory order entered pursuant to the order of reference to general master, which conferred jurisdiction on the general master to entertain matters pertaining to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Francisco v. Victoria Marine ShippingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Margulies v. LevyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. ABAMAR HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT INC. v. Lisa Daly Lady Decor, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. DEPT. OF H & R SERV. v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. Mahmoud v. KingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API