Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kester v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1992No. 135 Misc. Docket 1991Published

1Dissent

CRAIG, President Judge,

dissenting.

As the majority opinion states, the board’s preliminary objections contend that (1) this action is within this court’s appellate jurisdiction, and that (2) the board properly detained petitioner pending the disposition of new criminal charges.

1. Jurisdiction

Judicial Code section 768(a), 42 Pa.C.S. § 763(a), provides in relevant part as follows:

Commonwealth Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction of appeals from final orders of government agencies in the following cases:(1) All appeals from Commonwealth agencies under Sub-chapter A of Chapter 7 of Title 2 ...…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bronson v. Commonwealth Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Pennsylvania Dental Ass'n v. Commonwealth Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Ryles v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Bellochio v. BD. OF PROBATION & PAROLECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Pennsylvania Dental Ass'n v. Commonwealth Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API