Brimson v. Arnold
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the H'on. Albert C. Barnes, Judge, presiding. This was a bill in chancery filed by the appellees, in the superior court of Cook county, against D. Arnold, Jacob Glos, trustee, and others, to set aside as a cloud upon their title (which was alleged to be a fee) to the west eighteen feet of lot 8 and the east twenty-two feet of lot g, in block 8, in Clough & Barney’s subdivision of lots 34 and 35, in school trustees’ subdivision…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the H'on. Albert C. Barnes, Judge, presiding. This was a bill in chancery filed by the appellees, in the superior court of Cook county, against D. Arnold, Jacob Glos, trustee, and others, to set aside as a cloud upon their title (which was alleged to be a fee) to the west eighteen feet of lot 8 and the east twenty-two feet of lot g, in block 8, in Clough & Barney’s subdivision of lots 34 and 35, in school trustees’ subdivision of section 16, township 38, north, range 14, east of the third principal meridian, in the city of Chicago, county of Cook…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hand
The evidence clearly shows that the tax-deed sought to be canceled was void for want of notice to the appellees of the tax sale and when the period of redemption would expire, and the decree should be affirmed unless-the court committed reversible error in some one of the following particulars;
First—It is contended that the appellees did not establish that the premises described in the bill were the premises occupied by them. The appellees offered in evidence a deed to themselves from Fannie M. Gipson (of whom they purchased said premises) for the premises, bearing date October 3, 1895, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Glos v. HanfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1904