Rainey v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Concurrence
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge,
specially concurring, in which JOHNSON, Circuit Judge, joins:
I concur in the en banc court’s judgment in this case, reversing the district court because it improperly restricted the cross-examination of John Charles Rainey. The second issue in this case is whether the evaluative conclusions contained in Lieutenant Commander (LCDR) Morgan’s investigative report are admissible under Fed.R. Evid. SOS^XC).1 I write separately to urge the court to take its place among the majority of our sister circuits, favoring broad admissibility under Rule 803(8)(C)’s “factual findings”…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Chandler v. RoudebushSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.