Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Rainey v. Beech Aircraft Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 22, 1987No. Nos. 84-3625, 84-3626Published

1Concurrence

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge,

specially concurring, in which JOHNSON, Circuit Judge, joins:

I concur in the en banc court’s judgment in this case, reversing the district court because it improperly restricted the cross-examination of John Charles Rainey. The second issue in this case is whether the evaluative conclusions contained in Lieutenant Commander (LCDR) Morgan’s investigative report are admissible under Fed.R. Evid. SOS^XC).1 I write separately to urge the court to take its place among the majority of our sister circuits, favoring broad admissibility under Rule 803(8)(C)’s “factual findings”…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Chandler v. RoudebushSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API