Legal Opinion
Bergman v. Senate Special Committee on Aging
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 6, 1975No. 75 Civ. 543PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GAGLIARDI, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action to declare invalid, and to enjoin compliance with, a subpoena issued by the Special Committee on Aging of the United States Senate (“Special Committee”). The subpoena was served upon the American Bank & Trust Co. (“American Bank”) and was signed by The Honorable Frank E. Moss as Chairman of the Subcommittee on Long-Term Care (“Subcommittee”) of the Special Committee. Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1346(a)(2). Plaintiffs have moved pursuant to Rule 65(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., for a temporary restraining order…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Watkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Mitchell Miller, Susan McDuffie Weeks, and John Henry McDuffieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Peter SeegerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Abram Flaxer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.