Legal Opinion

Asencio v. Medina

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 15, 2022No. 1:18-cv-00097Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CARLOS ASENCIO, Plaintiff, y 18-Cv-97 (SHS) PROBATION OFFICER JOSE MEDINA | OPINION & ORDER AND PROBATION OFFICER GARRETT HALL, Defendants. icin rset ell SIDNEY H. STEIN, U.S. District Judge. The Court has received defendants’ motion to preclude plaintiffs treating physician, Dr. Jason Baynes, from testifying at trial regarding his Initial Evaluation Addendum, (Defendants’ Letter Memorandum, Ex. A, ECF No. 109.) The one-paragraph Addendum sets forth the doctor’s opinions that the permanency of plaintiff's disability as well as certain…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Romanelli v. Long Island RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API