Legal Opinion
Electric Reduction Co. v. Lewellyn
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 27, 1926No. 3408PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
On July 2, 1918, plaintiff below, Electric Reduction Company, agreed to purchase from one Jouravleff 150 to 175 tons of tungsten ore. Jouravleff was to ship a car of 30 to 35 tons each month, beginning in August, 1918. The plaintiff was “to establish immediately a banker’s acceptance for $30,000 in favor of the seller for 60 days to cover and to be deducted from the first ear shipped. A like acceptance to be issued, if necessary, on each following car.” On August 29,1918, Charles Hardy, who represented Jouravleff, telegraphed the Reduction Company: “Reference contract…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Graves v. HornTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Lamar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- McNeal v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Royal Packing Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Behnke v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Minnie Viles, Administratrix of the Estate of Cloyd H. Viles, Deceased Harvey Viles Inez Viles Whaley Minnie Viles v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- A. Giurlani & Bro. v. Com'r of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- M. A. Burns Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.