Legal Opinion

State v. Simpson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 2006No. COA05-632PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

Although Blakely 1 errors arising under North Carolina’s Structured Sentencing Act are reversible per se, our Supreme Court in State v. Allen 2 limited the application of this rule to cases that were not final as of 21 July 2005. In this case, Defendant contends the use of a sentencing aggravating factor that was neither submitted to a jury nor stipulated by Defendant constituted a Blakely error. Because Defendant’s case was final as of 23 December 2003, Allen requires us to hold that he is not eligible for a new sentencing hearing.

The facts pertinent to this appeal indicate that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. State v. CollingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. State v. BaskinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. SpruiellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API