State v. Simpson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
Although Blakely 1 errors arising under North Carolina’s Structured Sentencing Act are reversible per se, our Supreme Court in State v. Allen 2 limited the application of this rule to cases that were not final as of 21 July 2005. In this case, Defendant contends the use of a sentencing aggravating factor that was neither submitted to a jury nor stipulated by Defendant constituted a Blakely error. Because Defendant’s case was final as of 23 December 2003, Allen requires us to hold that he is not eligible for a new sentencing hearing.
The facts pertinent to this appeal indicate that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- State v. CollingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. BaskinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. SpruiellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.