State v. Scruggs

Fain, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Stephanie B. Scruggs appeals from her conviction and sentence for menacing by stalking. Scruggs argues that (1) Ohio’s menacing by stalking statute is unconstitutionally vague, (2) the state failed to present sufficient evidence of her guilt, and (3) the jury’s verdict is against the manifest weight of the evidence. In support of her void-for-vagueness and insufficiency-of-the-evidence arguments, Scruggs notes, among other things, that while the complaint filed against her alleged that the offense occurred “on or about May 29, 1998,” the trial court admitted…