Legal Opinion

United States v. Estrada

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 25, 1966No. 19,718PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

2Per curiam

This is another ease in which, at the time of the supervisory authority’s review and action, his powers with respect to suspending the adjudged punitive discharge were circumscribed by the provisions of section 0120a, Manual of the Judge Advocate General, Department of the Navy. For the reasons stated in United States v Prince, 16 USCMA 314, 36 CMR 470, the accused is entitled to a new review and post-trial action on his case, uninfluenced by the purported requirement that the supervisory authority give reasons for suspending a punitive discharge adjudged in a case in…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. PrinceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  2. United States v. HaronUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. BurgardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API