Legal Opinion
Fogerty v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided March 6, 2018No. SC 96030PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPaul C. Wilson, Judge
Matthew Fogerty ("Fogerty") filed a personal injury suit against his co-employee, Larry Meyer ("Meyer"), for injuries he sustained while they were working together to build a fountain. The trial court sustained Meyer's motion for summary judgment. Fogerty appealed, and this Court has jurisdiction under article V, section 10, of the Missouri Constitution. The circuit court's judgment is affirmed.
Background
Fogerty was employed by Wright Construction Company ("Employer"). In October 2011, Fogerty was assigned to work at Logan College. When he arrived for work, he was assigned to work with Meyer…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Curtis v. McNairSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Curt Peters and Cheri Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., and Patrick TerrioSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
- Kelso v. W. A. Ross Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Tauchert v. Boatmen's National Bank of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Paige Parr, a minor, by and through her Conservator, Janett Waid, Jerimy Morehead, and Charles Parr v. Charles Breeden, Wendy Cogdill, and Melanie ButtrySupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Andrew Halsey v. The Townsend Corp of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Charles Mems and Elaine Mems v. Dwayne A. LabruyereMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Danny Brock v. Peter Dunne, in his Capacity as Ad Litem for Mark EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2021
- Nolen v. CunninghamMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Williams v. AotVermont Superior Court · 2026