Legal Opinion

Vickers v. Howard

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 7, 1968No. 6 Div. 428PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

Appellant sued the defendants alleging that she was injured as a proximate result of their combined and concurring negligence. The jury found for the defendants. Appellant filed a motion for a new trial which was overruled and this appeal followed.

Appellant’s argued assignments of error make one contention which she states in brief may he “succinctly stated as follows: The Foreman of the jury, Jerry W. Reynolds, was a licensed agent of Hardware Mutual Casualty Company which he concealed upon identification of the jury, thereby depriving Plaintiff’s attorney of the opportunity…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morris v. Zac Smith Stationery CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  2. Hayes v. BoykinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Parkinson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. Jackson v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. McHenry v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Bishop Freeman Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Parish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. Smithson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  4. Alabama Power Co. v. BonnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. Mann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API