Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pajestka v. Faulhaber

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1977No. 76-1013PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

It is apparent that counsel for appellants filed his motion for reconsideration pursuant to App. R. 26, which prescribes the proper procedure for making application for reconsideration. However, App. R. 1 specifically states that the appellate rules govern procedure in appeals to courts of appeal from the trial courts.

In the instant cause, appellants brought a mandamus action in the Court of Appeals, invoking that court’s original jurisdiction granted in Section 3, Artcile IV of the Ohio Constitution. Thus the appellants mistakenly attempted to file a motion not prescribed for a court having…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Burnes v. Athens County Clerk of CourtsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Clark v. LileOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Myers v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Burnes v. Athens Cty. Clerk of CourtsOhio Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API