Legal Opinion

Village of Breedsville v. Township of Columbia

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1945No. Docket No. 36, Calendar No. 43,065PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Plaintiffs filed a bill for a. declaratory decree under the provisions of Act No. 36, Pub. Acts 1929 (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13903 et seq. [Stat. Ann. § 27.501 et seq.]).

Plaintiffs are the village of Breedsville,- an. incorporated village, and a group of residents and taxpayers of said village and the township of. Columbia. They allege that county highway No. 677 in Van Burén county runs through the village, of Breedsville; that on said highway and within- the corporate limits of the village there ' is á bridge which was built in 1890 by the township of Columbia and maintained by the township…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Washington-Detroit Theatre Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Evans Products Co. v. State Board of EscheatsMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Somberg v. SombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. City of Flint v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. School Committee of Cambridge v. Superintendent of SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Ambs v. Kalamazoo County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. City of Lake Angelus v. Oakland County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. McLeod v. McLeodMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Koebke v. LaBudaMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API