Legal Opinion

Shipp v. Scott School Tp.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 30, 1931No. 4597PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Six claims of patent No. 1,711,814 to appellant, covering a radiator box base, were involved in the suit, which resulted in a decree for appellees. The district court found claim 9 noninfringed and the other claims invalid.

In disposing of the case, the court filed “specific findings of fact and conclusions of *1020law.” They well state the facts, and we quote therefrom:1

Infringement tnms upon the presence and effect of the words “channel bar of corrugated metal for eaeh edge having a turned edge hooked to a- respective one of said base edges.” The specifications and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walker Mfg. Co. v. Illinois Brass Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Oliver-Sherwood Co. v. Patterson-Ballagh CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  2. Application of Hugh Harper Gibbs and Richard Norman GriffinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  3. Application of BersworthCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  4. Chandler v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1940
  5. Eclipse MacH. Co. v. J. H. Specialty Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API