Legal Opinion

Pollock v. Brayton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCushing, J.

Plaintiffs William T. Pollock and others, in their action for partition of real estate instituted in the court of common pleas of Hamilton county, claim that they and Dean F. Brayton are tenants in common in the property described in the petition.

The defendants claim to have an interest in -the property by purchase from Edward Charles Pollock.

Thomas B. Tullis died in 1849. His will was probated that year. His three children, Jeremiah Tullis, Mary Anne Ludlow, and Martha Pollock survived him.

Jeremiah Tullis died in 1878, unmarried and without children.

Mary Anne Ludlow died in 1896. Her husband…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doe v. ConsidineSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. McCrea v. McCreaOhio Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jerman v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Parkinson v. ParkinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API