Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided May 24, 1989No. Docket No. 37395-85UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM H. MATHIS AND MARY BURNS MATHIS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Mathis v. Commissioner

Docket No. 37395-85.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1989-254; 1989 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 254; 57 T.C.M. (CCH) 519; T.C.M. (RIA) 89254;

May 24, 1989; As corrected May 25, 1989

David H. Flint and Edward H. Brown, for the petitioners.

Meryl J. Fuchs-Goldberg, for the respondent.

HAMBLEN

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

HAMBLEN, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners' Federal income tax and additions to tax as follows:

Additions to Tax

Taxable Year Ended

Deficienc…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Jack E. Golsen and Sylvia H. Golsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  4. Neely v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  5. Helvering v. National Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Palmer Ranch Holdings Ltd v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Estate of Hatchett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  3. Palmer Ranch Holdings LTD v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API