Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Tate Banks v. People Jensen v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 1, 2015No. 12SC932, 12SC1022 & 13SC211Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Coats

188 While I agree with the majority that in Miller v. Alabama, - U.S. --, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 2469, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), the Supreme Court created a new rule of criminal procedure not applicable to convictions already final before its announcement, I do not agree with the majority about the precise nature of that new rule or its impact on the sentencing statutes of this jurisdiction. In particular, I disagree with the justification offered by the majority for judicially redefining "life imprisonment," as that statutory term applied to juveniles sentenced for class 1 felonies during the times…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API