State v. Johnson

Defendant was convicted of the larceny of two calves. His motion for a new trial >was denied, and he appeals to this court.

It is the contention of defendant that his conviction rests upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice, and that for that reason the judgment must be reversed.

The calves that are claimed to have been stolen belonged to one Snavely. He testified that he saw and counted his *31cattle, including the calves claimed to have been stolen, on the evening of October 15; that they were then on the range where they were accustomed to graze; that he saw and counted them again on…