Legal Opinion

Carter v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 18, 1933No. 22874PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

The plaintiff sued the insurance company on an accident and health insurance policy providing disability benefits, on account of an injury to his left eye. The company’s defense was based upon a clause in the policy, that “this insurance shall not cover injuries arising out of, or in the course of, any employment for wage or profit.” The facts are not in dispute. On the day of the injury the plaintiff was working on Peachtree road in or near Atlanta. His duties were to “send stuff up to the men on poles,” which were being set for Georgia Power Company *368or a corporation in charge of the work…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Archibald v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Carl Hagenbeck & Great Wallace Shows Co. v. LeppertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Zabriskie v. Erie R. R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  4. United States Casualty Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. H. T.C.R.R. Co. v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gage v. Connecticut General Life Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CroftCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  3. Keen v. St. Elizabeth Hospital Medical CenterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Craighead v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CroftCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API