Legal Opinion
Integra Bank v. Sixta (In Re Smith)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 8, 1996No. 19-20791PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOSEPH L. COSETTI, Bankruptcy Judge.
The matters before the court are Debtor Eleanor C.K. Smith’s Petitions for Rule to Show Cause Why an Order to Mark Judgment Satisfied and Awarding Liquidated Damages Should Not be Entered. For the reasons expressed below, the requests shall be denied.
Facts
The facts surrounding this matter and this debtor relate back a number of years. "While not all of the facts concerning the historical background have been presented by the debtor or plaintiff in their papers in connection with this particular matter, the court takes judicial notice of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- First National Consumer Discount Co. v. FethermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Valley Trust Co. of Palmyra v. LapitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Citizens Nat. Bank of Evans City v. GoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Fidelity Bank, N.A. v. BourgerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
3Cited by6 opinions
- 37 Collier bankr.cas.2d 713, Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,290 Lamar A. McCartney v. Integra National Bank North, Successor to McDowell National Bank Gary J. Gaertner, U.S. TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- In re: Marshall L. Rader and Barbara J. RaderUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- McCartney v. Integra National Bank NorthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Bank of New York v. HarveySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- JAGER v. INFIRST BANKDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.