Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2010No. 25428PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Joshua John Armstrong was convicted of Sexual Contact with a Person Under Sixteen in violation of SDCL 22-22-7. The trial court admitted evidence of Armstrong’s 1999 conviction of Rape in the Third Degree as well as statements he made in group counseling sessions as part of the mandatory prison sex offender counseling program. The trial court also limited Armstrong’s cross-examination of the victim regarding allegations of sexual abuse she made against another individual. Armstrong appeals. We affirm the trial court on all issues.

BACKGROUND

[¶2.] T.A. (Mother) is the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. RhinesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. MoellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. United States v. Guinn Dutton HodgesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. State v. DillonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. Iron ShellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. PrinceSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  2. State v. BirdsheadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. ArmstrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. LutesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Prince v. BrewerDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API