Legal Opinion

Behling v. Rivers

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided November 1, 1946No. Civil Action No. 1497PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARING, District Judge.

The complaint in this case alleges personal injuries as a result of an automobile collision between a car in which the plaintiff was riding and one owned by the defendant Rivers. The other defendant, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, is joined because it furnished liability insurance as required by the statutes of the State of South Carolina, the individual defendant being a carrier for hire. Under the statutes in this State, there are various classifications for carriers for hire and certificates are issued by the State government for various classes based upon…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. BohonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Piper v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Benn v. Camel City Coach Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Lake v. Texas News Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1931
  5. Thompson v. BassSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoosier Cas. Co. of Indianapolis, Ind. v. FoxDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
  2. Elbert v. Lumbermen's Mut. Cas. Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1952
  3. Orlikowski v. MearnsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1962
  4. Greear v. John Long Trucking, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API