Legal Opinion

Peterman v. Dunaway

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 23, 1924No. 15327Published

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

Where a tenant, without his landlord’s consent, seeks to remove from the premises any portion of the commercial crops before the rent is due, he is subject to distraint immediately, no matter what may be the purpose or intent of such removal. Daniel v. Harris, 84 Ga. 479 (10 S. E. 1013); International Agricultural Corp. v. Powell, 31 Ga. App. 348 (1) (120 S. E. 668); Little v. Lary, 12 Ga. App. 754 (3) (78 S. E. 470). In this case the evidence established, without dispute, that the tenant, without his landlord’s consent, had carried away from the rented premises two bales of cotton grown…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Daniel v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Little v. LaryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. International Agricultural Corp. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API