Legal Opinion
State v. Wiley
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 2, 2007No. 05-435PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
¶ 1. Defendant Timothy Wiley appeals from his convictions for aggravated sexual assault, lewd and lascivious conduct with a child, and obstruction of justice. Defendant asserts that (1) his convictions for both aggravated sexual assault and lewd and lascivious conduct violated the Double Jeopardy Clause, and (2) the evidence was insufficient to sustain any of the convictions. We affirm.
¶ 2. On May 22,2004, A.H. reported to her father, and then to police, that her mother’s boyfriend had forcible sex with her on numerous occasions in the past several months. A.H. was thirteen at the time. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. AguilarSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. GregaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Vermont · 2007